How to Beat the 80/20 Rule in Sales Performance
Business executives and sales managers frequently bemoan 80/20 performance on their sales teams, where approximately 80 percent of sales are produced by approximately 20 percent of salespeople. Of course, the ratio is not always 80/20. Sometimes it is 75/25, 70/30, 60/40, or even 90/10. However, the situation the ratio describes is always the same: the vast majority of salespeople produce a fraction of what top performers on the very same sales teams produce.
What are the reasons behind these performance disparities? What is it about top sales performers that enable them to achieve superior results? Can anyone achieve top performance in sales? Certainly there are some sales skills that anyone can learn. For example, it’s easy to teach how to ask reflective questions.
Asking Reflective Questions
Reflective questions are questions that begin with who, what, when, where, why and how. If you ask reflective questions instead of questions that can be answered with yes or no, prospects usually share more information with you. This increases your chances of uncovering "pain points" that can eventually lead to sales.
You can learn how to ask reflective questions by participating in a simple role play. In this role play, you'll play the salesperson and I'll play the prospect. Every time you ask me a yes or no question, I'll answer "no." Getting stonewalled with a bunch of "no" answers will break you of the yes/no questioning habit pretty quickly!
Other sales skills are tougher to learn. A good example is teaching salespeople how to ask questions and follow the thread in the answers. To explain this concept, let's use another role play. In this role play, you'll ask me reflective questions. I'll respond with answers that contain some "pain points".
If you recognize the pain points and drill down into them deeply enough (by asking additional questions), you'll eventually be able to "sell" me.
Do you know what my experience has been with this role play? Some salespeople learn how to "follow the thread" easily. Others struggle, but they eventually learn how to do it. However, some just never get it, any matter how hard they try! Why can some people learn this critical skill, but others can't?
I struggled with this question for 14 years. I used to believe that anyone could succeed at anything if they wanted it badly enough and were willing to work hard enough. However, my experience with the "follow the thread" role play made me start to question that belief. As I continued reading and researching over the years, I eventually uncovered two pieces of information that really opened my eyes.
Key Discovery #1
In their book, "Now, Discover Your Strengths," Marcus Buckingham and Donald Clifton report that great managers and average managers have different expectations for their employees. According to Buckingham and Clifton, average managers assume that "each person can learn to be competent in almost anything" while great managers assume that "each person's talents are enduring and unique".
Most sales books and training programs seem to take the average manager point of view. In other words, they seem to assume that anyone can learn how to sell. Their unspoken promise is that all you have to do is invest enough time, effort and money to learn the skills they teach. If you put the time and effort, you will learn the skills and eventually succeed in sales.
Unfortunately, there are countless examples of sales books and training courses not producing the desired improvement in sales performance. Think about some salespeople you know personally. How many of them are struggling to make their quotas? Why are they struggling?
- Is it the state of the economy? (If other salespeople are making their numbers, blaming the economy won't earn them much sympathy.)
- Is it because they don't work hard enough?
- Is it because they don't have enough product knowledge?
- Do they need to work harder on their selling skills?
- Do they need more coaching from their manager?
What if the "great manager" point of view is correct? What if everyone cannot become proficient in sales? What if success in sales requires a unique set of talents?KEY DISCOVERY #2
Herb Greenberg, Harold Weinstein and Patrick Sweeney report this very conclusion in their book, "How to Hire and Develop Your Next Top Performer". After correlating hundreds of thousands of assessments that were performed over several decades with actual sales performance measurements, they reached these startling conclusions:
55% of the people earning their living in sales should be doing something else.
Another 20% to 25% have what it takes to sell, but they should be selling something else
Wow! Those are some sobering statistics! They indicate that more than half of all salespeople are never going to make it in sales. Another quarter have some chance of accomplishing sales success, but only if they find the right job selling the right kind of product or service.
How can you identify whether salespeople have the talents required to succeed in your company's sales positions?
One reason why companies suffer from 80/20 performance is because their processes for hiring, training and managing salespeople rely almost entirely upon subjective information. After all, what are resumes? They are an individual's subjective portrayal of their capabilities and experiences. What occurs during an interview? Interviewees attempt to package their responses to questions in a manner that will make the best impression.
Meanwhile, interviewers are forming personal opinions about candidates' qualifications for the position.
I'm not suggesting that subjective information is useless. Subjective information is a valid and valuable component of any "people decision". However, if decisions based solely upon subjective information produce an undesirable result 80 percent of the time, doesn't it make sense to consider making a change?
One way to introduce objective information into sales hiring and coaching processes is through use of specialized sales assessment tests. I'm not referring to personality or behavioral tests like Myers-Briggs or DISC. Those types of tools are useful for learning how to communicate more effectively with someone, and may provide some insights into an individual's motivations. However, they are not effective for predicting whether or not someone will succeed in sales.
The specialized sales assessment tests that I'm referring to identify how quickly an individual learns and how good they are at "reasoning".
Reasoning - especially verbal reasoning - is a critical component of the talent for asking questions and "following the thread" in the answers. Plus, the most useful sales assessment tests identify an individual's strength or weakness in a variety of other important sales-related attributes. These include the following:
- Sales Drive: Does the individual enjoy presenting, persuading, negotiating, and motivating others? How much do they enjoy these activities?
- Emotional Toughness: How rapidly does the individual rebound from rejection? Do they learn from their experiences and move on quickly? Or, do they suffer a sustained reduction in productivity?
- Reasoning Ability: Does the individual ask good questions? Can they dissect answers and pick out the pieces that will help advance the conversation toward a desired end result?
- Service Drive: How friendly and agreeable is the individual? How interested are they in building relationships and helping others?
- Assertiveness: How self-assured is the individual? How effective are they at convincing others to take action?
- Attitude: How positive is the individual's attitude? Do they perceive a glass to be half-empty or half-full?
- Communication Skills: How precisely does the individual communicate, both verbally and in writing? Are their communications clear and effective?
- Competitiveness: How competitive is the individual? How does their competitiveness manifest itself?
- Energy: How energetic is the individual? Are they always "on the go", or do they need to be prodded into action?
- Independence: How readily does the individual accept direction from others?
- Learning Rate: How rapidly does the individual learn new information? What styles of learning are most productive for them?
- Tolerance for Administration: How willing is the individual to perform administrative activities? How much attention do they pay to details?
- Are they a Hunter or a Farmer? Do they prefer to pursue new business, or do they prefer to manage existing customer relationships? Or, are they capable of performing both functions effectively?
- Are they Internally or Externally motivated? Internally motivated salespeople are capable of directing their own activities. Externally motivated salespeople require frequent direction and support from their manager in order to be consistently effective.
- How effectively will they Prospect? How aggressively (and consistently) will they pursue new opportunities?
- How willing are they to comply with Administrative Requirements? This may include updating records in your company's customer relationship management (CRM) system and providing timely and accurate forecasts and opportunity pipeline updates.
- Will they be a good Team Member? Will they work cooperatively with their fellow sales team members, as well as other departments?
How can specialized sales assessment tests help existing salespeople who are struggling?
They can help in two specific ways. First, they can determine which salespeople should be in sales. If an individual doesn't have the talents required for success in your company's sales job, there may be other roles in your organization where their talents and interests can be applied to mutual benefit. If there aren't any such positions available, the kindest thing you can do is to let them go.
How can firing someone be kind? Because it is NO fun to struggle in a job that is a poor fit. If you share the assessment test results with these individuals, they can gain insights into their strongest talents and interests. The sooner they can migrate into roles that are compatible with their talents and interests, the sooner they will reap the benefits of improved productivity, motivation, and job satisfaction.
The second way these assessment tests can help struggling salespeople is by identifying their unique training needs. If you identify each salesperson's individual training needs, and you supply targeted training to address these needs, you can dramatically improve their performance. Here's an example:
Two fictitious salespeople, Beth and Bill, work for the same company. Beth is weak in Sales Drive, which makes her reluctant to ask for orders. Bill is weak in Emotional Toughness, which makes him sensitive to rejection and limits his prospecting effectiveness. If Beth and Bill go through the same sales skills training course, how much improvement in sales performance should they expect to see?
The answer is little or none. Why? Because Beth and Bill have completely different training needs that will not be addressed by basic sales skills training.
Beth would benefit most from attending an assertiveness training class. She also needs coaching to help her recognize that failing to ask for orders denies her customers valuable solutions to costly business problems.
Bill needs to learn to not take rejection personally. He might also benefit from attending a class that teaches positive thinking and other motivational techniques.
Unfortunately, unless these two salespeople are made aware of their unique training needs, and provided with targeted training to address them, there isn't much reason to expect their performance to improve.
Many companies struggle with "80/20" performance disparities in their sales organizations. These disparities usually result from an over-reliance on subjective information when making salesperson hiring and coaching decisions. The proposed solution is to add objective information gathered via specialized sales assessment tests to the "people decision" process. This one change can help companies increase the proportion of top performers on their sales teams and improve the performance of existing sales team members.